|
Context Goes AWOL in Tennessee September 14, 2006 A Corker ad omits relevant facts in attacking Ford's record on national security. Summary Tennessee Senate Candidate Bob Corker joined forces with the NRSC to produce an ad asking Tennessee voters who Democratic Representative Harold Ford, Jr. is "kidding" on national security.
The ad is correct as far as it goes. However it fails to mention Ford voted in favor of a compromise essential to the PATRIOT Act's reauthorization and that the vote he cast to cut defense spending came well before 9/11 and the war on terror. Analysis On Sept 8 an ad funded jointly by former Chattanooga Mayor Bob Corker’s Senate campaign and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) was released on NRSC & Corker Campaign Ad: "Don't be Fooled" Harold Ford Jr. (From TV Ad): Because there’s nothing, nothing more important than our security. Voted to Cut Defense Funding? It's true, as the ad says, that Ford voted in favor of an amendment proposed by the Congressional Black Caucus that would have cut defense spending by over 16 percent for fiscal 2001, directing the additional funds to education and working class family safety net programs. What the announcer doesn't tell us is that Ford cast the vote in March 2000, before the attack on the The ad also doesn't mention that on the same day that he voted for the amendment Corker cites, Ford voted in favor of an amendment that would have increased military spending, though only seven-tenths of a percent, which isn't enough to keep up with inflation. Ford's senior advisor for policy and communication, Tom Lee, told FactCheck.org that the Congressman believed "either budget resolution would have funded our military at a level appropriate at the time to provide for the defense of the nation, or he would not have voted for them." Voted Against Reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act? Ford had two opportunities to vote directly on the bill reauthorizing the PATRIOT ACT, once on the House committee report and again on the conference report. The ad is correct as far as it goes since Ford voted against the legislation both times. However, in December 2005, after both of those votes, the reauthorization bill stalled in the Senate, hung up on a debate about civil liberties. As we have reported earlier, Republican Sen. John Sununu of Voted to Release Felons from Jail? The ad claims Ford “voted to let liberal judges release felons from jail because of overcrowding.” The ad refers to a bill introduced in 1998 by then-House Majority Whip Tom DeLay of – By Emi Kolawole Sources CQ Staff. "House Passes Limits on Judges' Influence in State Prisons," Congressional Quarterly Weekly. 23 May 1998.
"HR 3718 - Federal Court Jurisdiction Regarding Prison Release Orders," Statement of Administration Policy. White House Office of Management and Budget. 19 May 1998. House of Representatives Vote No. 20, March 7, 2006. House of Representatives Vote No. 627, Dec 14, 2005. House of Representatives Vote No. 414, July 21, 2005 House of Representatives Vote No. 398, October 24, 2001. House of Representatives Vote No. 163, May 19, 1998. House of Representatives Vote No. 70, March 23, 2000. House of Representatives Vote No. 72, March 23, 2000.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 - 2009, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
FactCheck.org's staff, not the Annenberg Center, is responsible for this material.
|