|
DNC Radio Ad on Terrorism: Accurate (Mostly) August 27, 2004 Updated: September 2, 2004 Democratic ad reminds voters: Bush opposed creating the Homeland Security department before he supported it. Summary A Democratic National Committee radio ad released Aug. 12 says President Bush opposed creation of the Department of Homeland Security "for almost a year after 9/11." In fact, he opposed creation of a new department for less than nine months.
It also says Kerry "fought to establish" the department. Kerry did speak in favor and voted for it, but wasn't a cosponsor. He and other Democrats also squabbled with Bush over labor protections for its employees, a fight that delayed the department's creation for several additional weeks. The ad says Kerry "was fighting for legislation to cut off terrorist money laundering before 9/11." And in fact, a section of a Kerry bill on money-laundering was virtually copied into the PATRIOT Act and praised by Bush administration officials. Analysis The DNC radio ad is a rebuttal to Bush attacks on Kerry's record on terrorism, which it calls "beneath the office of President." The title of the ad is "Beneath." Whether Bush's statements are suitable or not is a matter of opinion that we won't address here. The factual claims made in the ad we find generally accurate, though a bit exaggerated in places.
Puffery about Kerry The ad claims “Kerry fought to establish the Department of Homeland Security.” (emphasis added) That's a bit of puffery: Kerry did support the legislation but wasn't a cosponsor of the reorganization bill or any of the related measures it incorporated except for one narrow bill -- S.2554 -- to allow airline flight-deck officers to carry firearms. (That gun bill's main sponsor was Republican Sen. Bob Smith of New Hampshire. He introduced it May 23, 2002, and Kerry added his name as a co-sponor more than two months later, on July 25.) Kerry spoke on the floor of the Senate on Nov. 19, 2002, and voted for creating the Homeland Security Department on the same day:
The Democrat mentioned in news accounts most prominently as pushing the legislation was not Kerry, it was Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, whom Kerry later defeated for the 2004 presidential nomination. Lieberman was a co-sponsor, worked on the legislation in the Government Affairs Committee of which he is the top-ranking Democrat, and was one of the few Democrats invited to the White House for the signing ceremony. Puffery about Bush The ad gets it right when it says Bush opposed creation of the department at first. White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said on Oct. 24, 2001 -- six weeks after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon:
Bush didn't change course until several months later. On June 6, 2002 he said during a national address:
Simple math shows that less than nine months passed between Sept. 11, 2001 and June 6, 2002. Calling that "almost a year" is an exaggeration. Also worth noting is that a partisan fight over union rights at the new department consumed several additional weeks. Bush wanted flexibility to waive union rules in the name of national security and sought wide freedom to manage employees. Democrats opposed that with such determination that at times it appeared the legislation might fail. Both sides must share blame for that delay. Eventually, Bush signed the act creating the department November 25, 2002. Terrorist Money Laundering The ad accurately claims that Kerry “was fighting for legislation to cut off terrorist money laundering even before 9/11.” The DNC cites the International Counter-Money Laundering and Foreign Anticorruption Act (S. 2972), which Kerry proposed on July 27, 2000. It’s also true that at least one section of a later version of the bill – which Kerry introduced on Feb. 27, 2001 (S. 398) – was copied nearly word-for-word into the PATRIOT Act (H.R. 3162) (sec. 101 and sec. 311 respectively) and praised by administration officials. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Juan C. Zarate said on June 23, 2004:
Kerry's Plan to Fight Terrorism It’s true, as the ad claims, that Kerry has a plan to fight terrorism, and its various parts are posted on the Kerry-Edwards Web site. As stated in the ad, Kerry promises to double the number of special forces, focuses on the possibility of nuclear terrorism as the greatest threat facing the country, and constantly talks of rebuilding international alliances. Whether it’s “the smart way” and whether Kerry would be “a president to make us stronger” are, of course, matters of opinion that we won't address here. As to the facts, the ad is reasonably on target. Sources U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes, 107th Congress – 2nd Session, H.R. 5005, Vote #249, 19 Nov. 2002.
"Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer," 24 Oct. 2001. "Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation," 6 June 2002. Siobhan Gorman, "Vote Effort on Homeland Department Fails," National Journal, 21 Sep 2002. Richard W. Stevenson, "Signing Homeland Security Bill, Bush Appoints Ridge as Secretary," New York Times, 26 Nov 2002. U.S. Senate, 106th Congress, 2nd Session, S. 2972, Proposed 27 July 2000. U.S. Senate, 107th Congress, 1st Session, S. 398, Proposed 27 Feb. 2001. U.S. House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 1st Session, H.R. 3162 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”), Proposed 23 Oct. 2001. "Keynote Address of Deputy Assistant Secretary Juan C. Zarate Ninth Annual American Express Anti-Money Laundering Conference," 23 June 2004. “A New Military to Defeat New Threats,” accessed at Kerry-Edwards official Web site, 26 Aug. 2004. “New Strategies to Defeat New Threats,” accessed at Kerry-Edwards official Web site, 26 Aug. 2004. John Kerry, “Fighting a Comprehensive War on Terrorism,” 24 Feb. 2004. |
|
|
Copyright © 2003 - 2009, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
FactCheck.org's staff, not the Annenberg Center, is responsible for this material.
|