Facebook Twitter Tumblr Close Skip to main content
A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center

Inspection Deception

Q: Will there be forced home inspections under the Affordable Care Act?
A: No. The law provides grants for state home-visiting programs for expectant and new parents. The programs are voluntary and participants can opt out any time.


I’ve heard through the Internet grapevine that a provision of the “Obamacare” bill will enable the government to make forced home inspections. Is this true?


The false claim that the health care law will force Americans to undergo home inspections began circulating online after an Aug. 13 post by blogger Joshua Cook was republished and mentioned by multiple websites. Cook wrote that “according to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be targeted” for home inspections. He included a video of South Carolina state Rep. Rick Quinn, during a state House subcommittee meeting in March, also expressing concern over “forced home inspections” under the Affordable Care Act.

The subcommittee members were discussing H3101, a state bill nullifying parts of the federal law. Quinn was talking to health care law critic Kent M. Brown — a trial lawyer who appeared at the hearing as an expert witness — when he brought up the alleged inspections. (The Quinn-Brown exchange begins at the 10:35 mark.)

Quinn, March 20: One of the things we can do … in terms of … preventing [state employees] from trying to enforce aspects of this [law] … for example, the forced home inspections that I’ve heard about –

Brown: And those are true by the way.

Quinn: Yes.

But that’s not true. The program in question involves voluntary home services for expectant mothers and fathers and those with very young children. Families can be referred for services or they can request them on their own. More important, they can opt out at will.

130904_forced-home-inspectionsSection 2951 of the health care law amended the Social Security Act by creating the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. A Sept. 22, 2011, press release announcing $224 million in funding for the program said that participating families would receive in-home consultations from nurses and social workers who would help families plan to “improve maternal and child health, child development, school readiness, economic self-sufficiency, and child abuse prevention.” The law obligated a total of $1.5 billion over five years to state agencies to expand and improve home-visiting programs for families and children from birth to age 5. The law requires states to spend at least 75 percent of the funds on evidence-based home models that are proven to work for families.

The goal of the home-visiting program is to “improve health and development outcomes for at-risk children,” according to the Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the program through the Health Resources and Services Administration and the Administration for Children and Families. However, no one will be forced to participate, according to a spokeswoman for the Health Resources and Services Administration. The programs, which existed in as many as 46 states as of fiscal year 2010, are completely voluntary.

“The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration is a voluntary program for women and families,” the spokeswoman wrote in an email to FactCheck.org. “Women and families enrolled in home visiting programs may discontinue services without consequence at any time and for any reason.” That point is also made clear in the law (page 251), which says that grant recipients must ensure that “the participation of each eligible family in the program is voluntary.”

Cook wrote that certain “high-risk” families would be “targeted” for inspections, but the reality is that the law stipulates (page 250) that state programs should prioritize providing services to those who need them most. That includes: low-income families; pregnant women under the age of 21; families with a history of child abuse, neglect, substance abuse or tobacco use; and others. An August 2011 report from the Pew Center on the States, which supports the home-based programs, said that “states did not consistently target at-risk families, where the return on investment is highest.”

— D’Angelo Gore



Cook, Joshua. “Obamacare Provision: ‘Forced’ Home Inspections.” BenSwann.com. 13 Aug 2013.

Unruh, Bob. “Obamacare troops planning home visits.” World Net Daily. 15 Aug 2013.

Cook, Joshua. “SC House Subcommittee Gives Favorable Report to Nullify Obamacare (Video).” Greenville Post. 20 Mar 2013.

Health Resources and Services Administration. Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. Webpage. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

Office of the Administration for Children and Families. Affordable Care Act Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) and Tribal MIECHV. Webpage. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111–148. 111th Congress.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “HHS announces $224 million to support evidence-based home visiting programs to help parents and children.” 22 Sep 2011.

Pew Center on the States. States and the New Federal Home Visiting Initiative: An Assessment from the Starting Line. August 2011.

Pew Center on the States. Home Visiting Inventory. Webpage. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

Rair, Lesa, spokeswoman, Pew Center on the States. Email sent to FactCheck.org. 22 Aug 2013.